Skip to contents

Limitations and Responsible Use

Source: vignettes/limitations-and-ethics.Rmd
limitations-and-ethics.Rmd

Why this matters

Computational models of consciousness can be misleading if presented too strongly.

The functions in consciousnessModelR are toy educational models. They are designed to help learners compare theory structures, not to evaluate real minds.

What the package does not do

The package does not:

  • Detect consciousness
  • Measure subjective experience
  • Diagnose cognitive states
  • Determine whether AI systems are conscious
  • Represent detailed brain physiology
  • Resolve the hard problem of consciousness

Responsible interpretation

A simulation may show competition, broadcast, integration, threshold crossing, or network activation. These are formal patterns, not proof of conscious experience.

Educational value

The models are useful because they make abstract ideas concrete.

Students can ask:

  • What assumptions does each theory make?
  • What variables matter?
  • What outputs would count as evidence?
  • What is missing from the model?
  • How could the model be improved?

Suggested readings

For broader philosophical and scientific context, see Chalmers, Seth, Baars, Dehaene, and Tononi (Chalmers 1996; Seth 2018; Baars 1988; Dehaene 2014; Tononi 2004).

Baars, Bernard J. 1988. A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Chalmers, David J. 1996. The Conscious Mind. Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, Stanislas. 2014. Consciousness and the Brain. Viking.
Seth, Anil K. 2018. “Consciousness: The Last 50 Years and the Next.” Brain and Neuroscience Advances 2.
Tononi, Giulio. 2004. “An Information Integration Theory of Consciousness.” BMC Neuroscience 5 (42).